| |
News on Ports
TAMP
Okays 10 per cent tariff hike in Chennai private box terminal
Tariff Authority for Major Ports (TAMP) has given its approval
for an average 10 per cent hike in tariffs on carnage and wharfage
at the privatized container terminal in Chennai port. Following
this hike, the existing penal charges on demurrage cargo will
now be applicable, only when a cargo removed from container and
stored beyond three days. Such penal charges will be applicable
on Less than Container Load (LCL) cargo, which requires destuffing
at the port, beyond three-day free period, at the rate of Rs.
10 per tonne per day up to 10th day and Rs. 100 per tonne per
day thereon. The P&O Ports, the private terminal operator
had sought the revision of the port charges and for reduction
in tenure of free period from earlier ten days to three days.
Before the take-over of the container terminal by P&O Ports,
the penal charges of Chennai Port Trust (CPT) ranged from Rs.
15 to Rs. 50 per tonne per day after the 10-day free period.
BOOST
pact for Rewas and Dighi port signed The Maharastra Maritime
Board (MMB) has entered into a Build Own Operate
Share and Transfer (BOOST) agreement with Amma Lines Ltd and Dighiport
Ltd. respectively for the development of Rewas and Dighi ports.
As per the agreement terms, the concession period is up to 50
years, including five years of construction period. As per the
estimates prepared by the two companies, the project is expected
to cost around Rs. 12-15 billion in the first phase, with the
Maharashtra Maritime Board (MMB) holding an equity of 11 per cent.
The first phase of Rewas port would constitute of five berths,
comprising two bulk, one petrochemical terminal and two container
berths. The Dighi port would involve construction of two liquid
cargo terminals for crude, chemicals and LNG and a container berth
in the second phase.
Four
port developers short listed for Gangavaram port The selection
process for choosing the successful bidder for the Rs 15. 2 billion
Gangavaram port project has been initiated with four out of the
10 companies that had shown interest in the project being now
short-listed. Four companies had collected their request for proposal
(RFP) and the deadline for submission of the detailed proposals
is fixed on May 8. 2002. The Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation (APIIC), the nodal agency to develop the Gangavaram
port, through private participation, is expected to take a final
decision and select the final developer in place by June-end.
The four companies finally in the race are Adani Exports Ltd,
a consortium of Dubai Ports International, West Port Holdings
of Malaysia and the Singapore-based Jurong Consultants, the Lanco
group and another consortium of BMT Asia-Pacific Ltd of Singapore
and Port of Brisbane Corporation of Australia. According to APIIC's
projections, the Gangavaram port had the potential to receive
17.57 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) of traffic by 2006 (including
8.8 MTPA of dry bulk, 4.08 MTPA of container and 1.09 MTPA of
liquid bulk cargoes) and 35 MTPA by 2012 (including 22.2 MTPA
of dry bulk and 7.8 MTPA of container traffic).
Back
to top
News on Shipping
Exemption
bank guarantee for transshipment containers urged Shreyas
Shipping, in a letter addressed to the Mr. Bongirwar, chairman
of the Committee on Transshipment and also of the Jawaharlal Nehru
Port Trust (JNPT) has urged for exemption of 15 per cent bank
guarantee requirement for carrying out transshipment of containers.
The Committee on Transshipment headed by Mr. Bongirwar in its
report had recommended simplification of transshipment procedures,
through a common corporate guarantee instead of bank guarantees
in respect of each container movements. The bank guarantee in
respect of custom bonded goods is enforced for purposes of customs
recovery, in case of non-fulfillment of transshipment obligation.
However, coastal shipping operators feel that they would benefit
if exempted from having to furnish bank guarantees, as they will
be able to handle more tonnage.
SCI
permitted to negotiate contracts with HPCL, BPCL
The government has reportedly allowed the Shipping Corporation
of India (SCI) to directly negotiate with public sector oil refineries
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL) and Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Ltd (BPCL) for transporting their crude cargo from
the Persian Gulf region. The decision to allow SCI to undertake
the crude transportation requirements of both HPCL and BPCL on
market-related AFRA rates was cleared on March 15. Both HPCL and
BPCL have contracts with suppliers in the Persian Gulf for import
of 15 million tonnes of crude for their refineries at Mumbai and
Visakhapatnam (for HPCL) and Mumbai and Kochi (for BPCL). The
SCI move follows the decision of Indian Oil Corporation (IOC)
to move out of the role nodal agency from April 1 2002 by finalizing
its annual crude purchase and transportation contracts on its
own. Both HPCL and BPCL are expected to follow IOC in making their
own crude purchase and transportation contracts without going
through the nodal agency system.
Back to top
News on Offshore
GSPC-Niko
to set up Hazira offshore platform The
Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation (GSPC) - Niko Resources
combine is reported to be finalizing plans to install an offshore
platform in the Hazira offshore area, at an estimated cost of
around Rs 300 crore. About 8-10 offshore platforms are to be
commissioned by 2003. Exploitation of offshore gas is expected
to result in increased production of gas, taking the total production
to around 4-5 million cubic metres per day. The additional gas
would also meet the increasing demand of the industries in Gujarat.
The Hazira gas field has been under development since 1995,
after GSPC and Niko signed a production sharing contract with
the government in 1994. So far, 19 wells have been drilled,
resulting in the establishment of a significant reserve base
and a daily production of over 2 million cubic metres of gas
daily. Various versions of reserve estimates have been discussed
between GSPC-Niko and the DGH over the past few years. However,
D&M was roped in order to have an independent opinion from
a reputed international firm.
|
|